Something to ponder..

Check your change bowl at home, perhaps you have one of these..


The man on the face of this coin is Martin Van Buren. He served one term as the President of the United States from 1836 to 1840. He is most noted for having laid the foundations for the Democratic Party and the modern political machine. This little fact makes Van Buren a rather unique individual however, he is also unique for another very interesting reason. Among all of the former presidents of the United States and including Nixon, Ford, Bush, Johnson, You name him, Van Buren is the only man that is not a descendant of the medieval King John of England Also known as John Lackland. John Lackland was the King of England from April 1199 until his death in 1216.

You might think that Barack Obama doesn’t qualify for this unusual family tree but, you would be sadly mistaken my friend because Barack Obama is ALSO included in this blood line through his white mother, Ann Dunham.

From the inception of the United States to this very day, each and every president of the United States with the exception of Martin Van Buren share this common ancestry with King John of England.

And even though Martin Van Buren wasn’t actually a great president being soundly defeated in his bid for a second term by the Whig Party’s James K. Polk, I’ll at least give him this one saving grace for not being one of the “good ol’ boys”.

I keep one of these Martin Van Buren $1 coins in my pocket where ever I go. I figure If I keep this coin I’ll never go broke.. And I’ll always have something to talk about with someone if they are willing to listen.

This truly remarkable discovery was made by a then 12 year old young lady named BridgeAnne d’Avignon, of Salinas, California back in 2012.


something to think about

John F. Kennedy held a dinner in the white House for a group of
the brightest minds in the nation at that time. He made this
statement: “This is perhaps the assembly of the most intelligence
ever to gather at one time in the White House with the exception
of when Thomas Jefferson dined alone.”


“When we get piled upon one another in large cities, as in Europe,
we shall become as corrupt as Europe.”—Thomas Jefferson

“The democracy will cease to exist when you take away from
those who are willing to work and give to those who would not.”
—Thomas Jefferson

“It is incumbent on every generation to pay its own debts as it
goes. A principle which if acted on would save one-half the wars
of the world.”—Thomas Jefferson

“I predict future happiness for Americans if they can prevent the
government from wasting the labors of the people under the
pretense of taking care of them.”—Thomas Jefferson

“My reading of history convinces me that most bad government
results from too much government.”—Thomas Jefferson

“No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms.”
—Thomas Jefferson

“The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep
and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against
tyranny in government.”—Thomas Jefferson

“The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the
blood of patriots and tyrants.”—Thomas Jefferson

“To compel a man to subsidize with his taxes the propagation of
ideas which he disbelieves and abhors is sinful and tyrannical.”
—Thomas Jefferson

Thomas Jefferson said in 1802:
“I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our
liberties than standing armies.
If the American people ever allow private banks to control the
issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the
banks and corporations that will grow up around the banks will
deprive the people of all property – until their children wake-up
homeless on the continent their fathers conquered.


help me out here…

Today, Justice Roberts sided with the four most liberal Justices
sitting on the Supreme Court of the United States. Justice
Roberts who is middle of the road with respect to our political
party system handed President Obama his seat in presidential
domestic policy history. The Supreme Court had several weeks
to rule on this Obamacare bill and I can’t believe Justice Roberts
seemed to have missed this little fact about writing laws for
America and it’s people.

First, here is the logic. Justice Roberts interprets the constitution
as stating that the government may not compel any Americans to
buy something from a private party under the Commerce clause
(good so far), but then says that congress can compel Americans
to pay the IRS taxes (a penalty or fine) if they do not buy
something from a private party. I’m sorry but does this even make
any sense?

It is a documented truth that the Obamacare bill that was
shoved through Congress two years ago and signed into law by
President BH Obama on March 23, 2010 was crafted and written
by the Senate. Now here is the little fact I mentioned earlier… In
Article 8 section 7 of the U.S. Constitution it states that all bills
for raising revenue shall originate in the House of Representatives.
By raising revenue they mean, taxation or creating tax law for the
purpose of spending by the U. S. Government.

It seems to me that Obamacare should be deemed null and void
based on this information and it also seems to me that all nine
Justices serving on the Supreme Court of the United States should
know this, after all, they all pledged an oath to uphold the
Constitution didn’t they? That means that they should know what
it says.

And for some interesting perspective from Peter Schiff, watch this:



the cure for cancer

The FDA, the National Cancer institute and big pharma are all in bed
together as well as many, many unethical doctors and scientists in my
opinion and over what? The cure for cancer.

I am amazed that I wasn’t aware of this until yesterday but whether
you believe it or not, there does seem to be a cure, thats right, a
CURE for malignant cancers and tumors that is NOT radiation or
chemotherapy and is NOT carcinogenic. It has NO side effects other
than to eliminate cancer. Sound unbelievable? Read on.

There is a doctor in Texas that discovered several medicines way
back in the mid 70’s that has CURED thousands and thousands of
cancer patients to date but has and is still being surpressed by,
you guessed it, the FDA, the NCI, and always in the background, big
Pharma. He has been in front of a Grand Jury over six times to date
by the FDA trying to put him in prison, His data and records stolen
under the guise of subpoena, his research duplicated by big Pharma,
AND his patents duplicated by big Pharma. All for the love of money.

You see, the FDA and big Pharma can not allow one man to hold the
patents for the cure for cancer. What would big Pharma do without
all that money that chemotherapy drugs generate for them?

Please understand that if and when the good doctors medicines are
approved for public use, it will allow a single scientist to hold an
exclusive right to manufacture and sell these medicines on the open
market—leaving the pharmaceutical industry absent in profiting from
the most effective gene-targeted cancer treatment the world has
ever seen. What really makes me angry is the fact that these
medicines were discovered almost 40 years ago and are to this day,
still not on the market.

Sound interesting? I highly urge you to watch this documentary. It
is quite an eye opener. It makes me wonder how many times the FDA
and big Pharma have been successful in repressing cures for disease
that we haven’t heard about, after all, there is no money in curing
people of disease but there sure is a boat load of money in treating
people for disease. Think about it.

This documentary is 108 minutes long without any commercial
interruptions. It will also be aired on the Documentary Channel on
May 4th, 2012. Get as many people to watch this and then let your
voice be heard about the unethical practices of our corrupted
system and the abuses of our beloved with cancer and the FDA’s
refusal to allow life saving drugs to CURE this blight called cancer.

You must click the link below the picture to watch the film.

See also,


a little comparison

Let me preface this by saying, I think this country has been on the
down side of a slipery slope for a long while now and I don’t trust
Democrats or Republicans at all. They are, in my opinon, all liars.
I believe that this country needs to read and live by the constitution,
period. With that being said, and by no means am I saying that Bush
was the end all be all of presidents, tell me what you think of this.


If George W. Bush had doubled the national debt,
which had taken more than two centuries to accumulate,
in one year, would you have approved?

If George W. Bush had then proposed to double the debt
again within 10 years, would you have approved?

If George W. Bush had criticized a state law that he admitted he never
even read, would you think that he is just an ignorant hot head?

If George W. Bush joined the country of Mexico and sued a state in the
United States to force that state to continue to allow illegal immigration,
would you question his patriotism and wonder who’s side he was on?

If George Bush had pronounced the Marine “Corps” like Marine “Corpse”
over and over again in a speech to the Marine Corps would you think
him an idiot?

If George W. Bush had put 87,000 workers out of work
by arbitrarily placing a moratorium on offshore oil drilling
on companies that have one of the best safety records
of any industry just because one company had an accident would you
have agreed?

If George W. Bush had been the first President to need a
TelePrompTer installed to be able to get through a press conference,
would you have laughed and said this is more proof
of how inept he is on his own and is really controlled
by smarter men behind the scenes?

If George W. Bush had spent hundreds of thousands of dollars of
TAXPAYER money to take Laura Bush to a play in New York City,
would you have approved?

If George W. Bush had reduced your retirement plan’s holdings
of GM stock by 90%and given the unions a majority stake in GM,
would you have approved?

If George W. Bush had made a joke at the expense
of the Special Olympics, would you have approved?

If George W. Bush had given England’s Prime Minister, Gordon Brown,
a set of inexpensive and incorrectly formatted DVD s,
when Gordon Brown had given him a thoughtful
and historically significant gift, would you have approved?

If George W. Bush had given the Queen of England
an iPod containing videos of his speeches,
would you have thought this embarrassingly narcissistic and tacky?

If George W. Bush had bowed to the King of Saudi Arabia,
would you have approved?

If George W. Bush had visited Austria and made reference to the nonexistent
“Austrian language,” would you have brushed it off as a minor slip?

If George W. Bush had filled his cabinet and circle of advisers
with people who cannot seem to keep current
on their income taxes, would you have approved?

If George W. Bush had stated that there were 57 states
in the United States, would you have said that he is clueless.

If George W. Bush would have flown all the way to Denmark
to make a five minute speech about how the Olympics would benefit him,
would you have thought he was a self important, conceited, egotistical jerk.

If George W. Bush had been so Spanish illiterate as to refer to “Cinco de Cuatro”
in front of the Mexican ambassador when it was the 5th of May (Cinco de Mayo),
and continued to flub it when he tried again, would you have winced in embarrassment?

If George W. Bush had misspelled the word “advice”
would you have hammered him for it for years
like Dan Quayle and potatoes as proof of what a dunce he is?

If George W. Bush had burned 9,000 gallons of jet fuel
to go plant a single tree on Earth Day,
would you have concluded he’s a hypocrite?

If George W. Bush’s administration had okay-ed Air Force One
flying low over millions of people followed by a jet fighter
in downtown Manhattan causing widespread panic,
would you have wondered whether they actually get what happened on 9-11?

If George W. Bush had failed to send relief aid to flood victims
throughout the Midwest with more people killed or made homeless
than in New Orleans, would you want it made into a
major ongoing political issue with claims of racism and incompetence?

If George W. Bush had created the position of 32 Czars
who report directly to him, bypassing the House and Senate
on much of what is happening in America , would you have approved.

If George W. Bush had ordered the firing of the CEO
of a major corporation, even though he had
no constitutional authority to do so,
would you have approved?

If the Prime Minister of America’s strongest ally, had taken George W
Bush to task, for his irresponsible declaration that his country give up
the land, that helps ensure his nations’ security from the many
surrounding enemy nations, who seek his nation’s destruction, would
you have called him an arrogant buffoon?

So, tell me again, what is it about Obama that makes him so brilliant
and impressive? Can’t think of anything? Don’t worry. He did all of
this in his first 28 months—so you’ll have twenty months to come
up with an answer.

Every statement in this email is factual and
directly attributable to Barrack Hussein Obama.
Every bumble is a matter of record and completely verifiable.

via kq6zz


9 eyes

Google’s Street View is fascinating as well as a helpfull tool for
internet users. There are some incredible images to be seen if
you just go looking for them. 9 Eyes is an art project that has
some interesting images to see although there are other sites
out there with unususal and often funny images too. Go look
for them and don’t forget to explore our world throught the
eyes of Google Street View also.


hams to the rescue

Boy what a mobile radio set up eh? It kills me to see that giant boat
anchor bolted to a truck bed pulling it’s power supply on a trailer
behind it and being called the ultimate mobile radio. Today, a mobile
radio with a lot more capability than the SCR-299 is smaller than a
phone book.

If you are interested in a little radio history, have a watch.